Apr 9, 2013

Funniest survey EVER!!


The following is a cut and paste from RNC's survey intended to get a better a handle on young voters and how they can outreach to them. The red font is the original survey, while my commentary is in blue.


How Do YOU View the Republican Party

Please do NOT take this survey if you are 30 years of age or older.

*
5. Where do you get your political information?
*
6. How do you most often communication with people?
*
7. Are you registered to vote?
*
8. Which issue(s) do you consider when you vote for a candidate for office?
*
9. Do you support gay marriage?
*
10. Do you think that a woman should be able to have an abortion?
11. Do you vote for a person based on which party they belong to?
*
12. What do you think about the Republican Party?

*
13. The Republican Party was founded on three core principles: Limited Government, Individual Responsibility and Low Taxes. Which of the following is true? None of these are the reason why the party was founded -- Anti-Slavery being omitted from founding of the story is a huge lapse.
*
14. Which of the following is true?
*
20. What would a Republican have to do or say in order for you to vote for her/him?

*
21. If you had to pick from only the following three options, which political affiliation best describes you?
*
22. If you meet a candidate or elected official and they are really nice, would you vote for them just because they were nice?
*
23. Do you feel like the Republican Party deserves your vote?
*
24. Have you ever had campaign literature dropped off at your front door? (mail box does NOT count)
*
25. Have television or radio ads ever helped you decide who to vote for?
*
26. Does the Republican Party seem fun? No, but if your taking this survey seriously Republican party seems funny if not fun.
*
27. Are Republican Party leaders and/or Republican politicians too old?
28. Do you think that anyone can consider themselves a Republican, regardless of whether they agree with the party on most things or not?
*
29. If the Republican Party had more candidates that were minorities, would you be more inclined to vote for a Republican?
*
30. Would you vote for a Republican candidate if they were:
*
31. Do you vote the same way as your parents?
*
32. If you are registered to vote, why did you decide to register?

*
33. What do you think about taxes? Twice as many answers available for taxes than for abortion, because there is only one real answer they wanted for question #10.
*
34. Do you know anyone who is gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender?
*
35. Should the government or voters get to vote on whether gay and lesbian couples can get married?
*
36. Do you think that the Republican Party discriminates against people? If so, which people?
*
37. Do you belong to any political organizations?
*
38. What is your sexual orientation?
39. ONLY ANSWER IF you are gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender, which of the following are true (question is optional) What about the people that are in the closet? 

*
46. Do you support the legalization of marijuana? If the response of the under thirty yearolds that the survey intended for is a vast majority, will that cause the GOP to stop collecting money from for-profit prisons and get on board marijuana legalization?
*
47. Should the United State build a fence along the US/Mexico border to keep illegal people out of our country? This survey may have been written by someone who's first language isn't English, but individuals aren't legal or illegal actions that individuals take can be legal or illegal.

Apr 5, 2013

Shows of solidarity or flaunting how unnecessary exaggerated salaries are needed at the top

Sequestration has taken a meat clever to the Federal budget, those hoping the cuts will affect programs for the working poor equal to the military contractors should not hold their breaths. Yesterday President Obama announced that he would return 5% for as long as the sequestration is in place to show a sign of solidarity of those being affected by the sequestration. Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel, Congresswoman Tammy Duckworth (IL-D), and Congresswoman Eleanor Norton (DC-D), have already volunteered salary paybacks of varying amounts. But the solidarity with those at the bottom of the economic strata, though nice in theory, won't have the effect that is intended of quickening a resolution to bring to an end of the sequestration. The cuts do not have equal affect since the military contractors have an excess largess while recipients of economic programs and middle class civil servant jobs do not have any excess resources to depend on during the hard times of the sequestration. To compare furloughed employees to executives who can spend a small portion of their profits to lobbyists and campaign contributions to ensure their largess comes back to pre-sequestration levels while no one advocates to restore anti-poverty programs.


http://www.politicususa.com/game-on-republicans-follow-president-obamas-lead-repaying-5-pay.html

Apr 4, 2013

Petulant Cry Baby Can't Understand Why Goofing Off During High School Causes Her To Be Rejected By Colleges

Last week Wall Street Journal published an editorial written by former employee Bari Weiss' little sister, Suzy Lee Weiss. She lamented that being her lazy goofing off self wasn't enough to get into a "name brand" university but apparently did pass the threshold of the bastion of meritocracy the Wall Street Journal. Had they shown a person that had put in effort to excel in academics, shown some sort of leadership, and then still rejected by her first choice schools that would have been worthy of Suzy Lee Weiss' indignation.

Maybe Suzy Lee Weiss' indignation was righteous, it's not like her parents are mindful parents (by her own admission "I noticed long ago that my parents gave up on parenting me") and she certainly has never been exposed to Ivy educated individuals that could show her path to get where they have taken (such as Columbia University 2007 graduate and bigger sister Bari Weiss). To acknowledge that she didn't put any effort into high school nor use nepotism to get an undeserved internship while diverting blame on the fact she is not any sort of oppressed class not "[n]avajo, Pacific Islander, anything" nor had the chance to be gay had "any closet, and I would've happily come out of it." Proposing the premise of having no challenges in life nor any desire to better one's self is an awful strategy to convey sympathies for your situation.

She seems to be inferring a great injustice done to her for her not following her big sister's foot steps into the Ivy league, but I came away that the great injustice is that some poor bastard is going to have her as a roommate in whatever Big Ten school admitted her for the Fall semester (she admitted in her follow up interview with online.WSJ.com that she did get accepted to several Big Ten schools). To categorize her missive as a 1st world problem, is a large understatement. To complain in a national newspaper for over 500 words that you aren't given what you are wanted all because you put forward near naught effort is thoroughly mind-boggling.

Overprivileged isn't a word (at least not yet) but when the word does enter into the dictionary, I fully expect a picture of Ms. Suzy Lee Weiss will be right there next to the definition. If only I was related to someone that worked for Wall Street Journal instead, but alas I only started my own blog with a website I created when I ran for public office. I will abide and let Ms. Suzy Lee Weiss get back to her TV stories.


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324000704578390340064578654.html

http://online.wsj.com/video/opinion-the-college-rejects-club/24432990-5DE3-421F-81A6-C247FB739D01.html?KEYWORDS=SUZY+LEE+WEISS

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304520804576347110395478634.html#articleTabs%3Darticle

http://gawker.com/5993140/attention-students-just-being-yourself-isnt-a-skill-that-should-earn-you-admission-to-college

http://www.tabletmag.com/scroll/72737/new-hires-at-tablet

http://www.columbia.edu/cu/current/pastissues.html